What Are My Rights if a Dog Attacks Me?: A Comprehensive Guide


    As an experienced Illinois plaintiffs' personal injury attorney, I understand the physical, emotional, and legal complexities that follow a dog attack. In Illinois, specific state laws and legal principles govern the rights of dog bite victims. This comprehensive guide aims to provide a clear understanding of these laws and the rights of individuals who have suffered from a dog attack.

    Illinois Dog Bite Law

    Illinois statute 510 ILCS 5/16, known as the Animal Control Act, is pivotal in dog bite cases. This law holds the dog owner strictly liable if their dog, without provocation, attacks, attempts to attack, or injures a person who is peaceably conducting themselves in a place where they are lawfully present. Let’s delve deeper into each component of the statute and use hypothetical examples to illustrate how these components are applied in real-world scenarios:

    1. Strict Liability:

    Illinois's approach to dog bites is one of strict liability, meaning the dog owner is liable regardless of the animal's previous behavior or the owner's knowledge of such behavior. 

    - Example: Imagine a scenario where a friendly dog, with no history of aggression, suddenly bites a neighbor. Even though the owner had no reason to believe the dog would be aggressive, under Illinois law, they would still be liable for the neighbor's dog bite injuries because the dog's previous behavior is irrelevant under strict liability.

    2. No Provocation:

    For a victim to claim under the Animal Control Act, they must not have provoked the dog. Determining provocation can sometimes be complex and is a common defense used by dog owners.

    - Example: In a case where a person is bitten after they startle a sleeping dog, the fact finder could theoretically determine this as provocation. However, provocation is typically found where someone is taunting the dog. If it’s found that the dog was provoked, the owner may not be held liable.

    3. Lawful Presence:

    The victim must have been lawfully present at the location where the dog bite occurred. This component is crucial in determining liability.

    - Example: If a delivery person is bitten while dropping off a package, they were lawfully on the property, making the dog owner potentially liable. Conversely, if a burglar enters a home and is bitten, they would likely not be able to claim damages since they were not lawfully present.

    4. Types of Recoverable Damages:

    The law allows victims to recover various types of damages, which can include more than just medical expenses.

    - Example: Consider a jogger bitten by a dog, leading to hospitalization and a lengthy recovery period. The jogger can claim medical expenses, lost wages due to being unable to work, and pain and suffering for the physical and emotional trauma caused by the attack.

    5. Case Law and Precedents:

    Illinois courts have heard numerous dog bite cases, further defining and interpreting the law. Every case is different. If there is a gray area, an experienced attorney can review how the courts have ruled in the past to provide insight as to how a court might determine your case. 

    6. Statute of Limitations:

    Victims have a limited time to file a lawsuit, generally two years in Illinois. This time frame is crucial in the legal process.

    - Example: If an individual is bitten in January 2024, they typically have until January 2026 to file a lawsuit. Failing to file within this period can bar them from seeking compensation later.

    7. The Role of Homeowner's Insurance:

    Many dog bite claims are addressed through the dog owner's homeowner's insurance, which usually covers such incidents.

    - Example: After a child is bitten by a neighbor's dog, the child's parents file a claim. The neighbor's homeowner's insurance policy covers the claim, providing compensation for the child’s medical treatment and other damages.

    8. Defenses in Dog Bite Cases:

    Owners can present defenses such as provocation or unlawful presence to challenge liability.

    - Example: In a scenario where a teenager is bitten while teasing a dog through a fence, the dog owner may argue that the bite was a result of provocation, potentially absolving them of liability.

    Understanding the nuances of Illinois Dog Bite Law is vital for anyone involved in such an incident. Each component of the law – from strict liability to the types of recoverable damages – plays a crucial role in shaping the outcome of a dog bite case. Whether you are a victim or a dog owner, it’s important to know your rights and responsibilities under this law. In any dog bite incident, consulting with an experienced attorney is essential to navigate the legal complexities and ensure a fair and just resolution.

    Categories of Damages

    Expanding on the types of recoverable damages in Illinois dog bite cases, it's essential to understand that compensation goes beyond mere medical expenses. The law recognizes several categories of damages that a victim can claim to address the full spectrum of harm suffered from a dog attack. Let’s examine these categories in more detail:

    1. Medical Expenses:

    This is often the most immediate and quantifiable form of damage. It includes all medical treatments directly related to the dog bite.

    - Example: In a case where an individual is bitten and requires emergency room treatment, surgery, rabies vaccinations, and follow-up care, all these costs can be included in the medical expenses claim.

    2. Lost Wages:

    If the victim misses work due to the injury, they can claim compensation for lost wages. This includes not only lost hours but also the loss of earning capacity if the injury leads to long-term disability.

    - Example: A construction worker bitten by a dog and unable to work for several weeks can claim the wages lost during this recovery period. If the injury results in a permanent disability that prevents them from returning to their previous job, they can also claim for lost future earnings.

    3. Pain and Suffering:

    This category covers the non-economic damages such as physical pain and emotional distress caused by the dog bite. Pain and suffering damages are subjective and can vary significantly from case to case.

    - Example: A victim who experiences chronic pain, anxiety, and fear of dogs after an attack can seek compensation for these ongoing sufferings. The severity and longevity of the pain and emotional trauma play a critical role in determining the amount.

    4. Disfigurement and Scarring:

    Dog bites can leave permanent scars or disfigurement, and victims can claim compensation for these long-lasting physical impacts.

    - Example: If a dog bite leaves visible scars on a person's face, they may be entitled to compensation for the psychological and social impact of living with disfigurement.

    5. Loss of Quality of Life:

    This refers to the diminished ability to enjoy life’s pleasures and activities that one engaged in before the injury.

    - Example: If a victim was an avid runner but can no longer engage in this activity due to the trauma or physical limitations resulting from the dog bite, they can claim damages for this loss of enjoyment in life.

    6. Psychological Counseling:

    Victims may require psychological counseling to cope with the trauma of a dog attack, especially if they develop conditions like post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD).

    - Example: A child bitten by a dog might need ongoing therapy to address fear and anxiety. The costs of such therapy can be included in the damages claim.

    7. Property Damage:

    If personal property was damaged during the dog attack, compensation for repair or replacement can be claimed.

    - Example: If a victim's clothing or a mobile device is damaged during the attack, the costs to repair or replace these items can be claimed as part of the overall damages.

    In Illinois, dog bite laws provide a comprehensive framework for victims to receive compensation for a variety of damages. Understanding the full scope of recoverable damages is crucial for effectively advocating for the rights of dog bite victims. Each category of damage plays a vital role in ensuring that victims are fairly compensated not only for their immediate injuries but also for the long-term physical, emotional, and financial impacts of the attack.

    Court Decisions That Have Shaped Dog Bite Laws

    Delving deeper into the case law and precedents in Illinois, we find that court decisions have significantly shaped the interpretation and application of the Animal Control Act, particularly in dog bite cases. These rulings are instrumental in setting precedents for how the law is applied in various circumstances. Let’s explore some notable cases and their impacts:

    1. Johnson v. Johnson (1979):

    This case is a cornerstone in Illinois dog bite law. The court in Johnson v. Johnson held that the Animal Control Act imposes strict liability on dog owners. The significance of this ruling lies in its establishment of the principle that a dog owner's knowledge of their pet's aggressiveness or previous bites is not necessary for liability. This case set the precedent that liability is not contingent upon the owner's awareness of the danger posed by their dog.

    2. Stehl v. Dose (1985):

    In Stehl v. Dose, the Illinois Appellate Court further clarified the concept of provocation under the Animal Control Act. The court held that a person's actions can be considered as provoking the dog if those actions would naturally lead to a dog's aggressive response. This case is often cited in determining whether a victim's behavior prior to a dog bite constitutes provocation, which is a critical factor in assessing liability.

    3. Zepeda v. Zepeda (1963):

    Prior to the strict liability standard set by the Animal Control Act, Illinois followed the common lawone-bite rule,” which required the victim to prove that the dog owner knew or should have known of the dog's vicious propensity. In Zepeda v. Zepeda, the court dealt with such a scenario. While this case is pre-Animal Control Act, it serves as a historical context for understanding the evolution of dog bite liability in Illinois.

    4. Siewerth v. Charleston (1991):

    This case addressed the issue of what constitutes 'lawful presence' under the Animal Control Act. In Siewerth v. Charleston, the court held that a person is lawfully on private property when performing duties required by state or federal law or postal regulations. This case is significant for cases where service people or public employees are bitten while on private property.

    5. Hayes v. Adams (1978):

    In Hayes v. Adams, the Illinois Appellate Court dealt with the issue of damages under the Animal Control Act. The court affirmed that victims of dog bites can recover full compensation for injuries caused by a dog, setting a precedent for the scope of damages recoverable under the Act.

    These cases collectively underscore the nuances in the application of the Animal Control Act in Illinois. They demonstrate the courts' interpretations of key elements like strict liability, provocation, lawful presence, and the extent of recoverable damages. Understanding these precedents is crucial for both plaintiffs and defendants in dog bite cases, as they provide a legal framework for arguing and defending claims under Illinois law. For attorneys handling such cases, these precedents offer valuable guidance in assessing liability, formulating legal strategies, and advocating for clients’ rights.

    Statute of Limitations for Dog Bite Lawsuits in Illinois

    In Illinois, the statute of limitations for filing a dog bite lawsuit is an essential legal principle that plaintiffs must be aware of. This statute dictates the time frame within which a victim must initiate legal action following a dog attack. Understanding this time limit is crucial, as failing to file a lawsuit within this period typically results in the loss of the right to pursue compensation. Here's a more detailed discussion:

    - The statute of limitations for dog bite cases in Illinois is generally two years from the date of the attack. This is set forth in 735 ILCS 5/13-202, which covers personal injury claims.

    - This two-year window is the period during which a victim must file a lawsuit in the state's civil court system. If a lawsuit is filed after this period, it is almost certain that the Illinois courts will refuse to hear the case, and the right to compensation will be lost.

    Exceptions and Special Circumstances:

    - Minors: If the victim is a minor, the statute of limitations typically does not begin to run until they reach the age of 18. Therefore, a minor victim of a dog bite would have until their 20th birthday to file a lawsuit.

    - Disability: If the victim is under a legal disability at the time of the injury (e.g., mental incompetence), the statute may be extended to accommodate these circumstances..

    Importance of Timely Action:

    - Prompt legal action is crucial in dog bite cases. Waiting too long can not only risk exceeding the statute of limitations but can also make it harder to gather evidence and build a strong case.

    - Victims are advised to consult with a personal injury attorney as soon as possible after a dog attack to ensure their rights are protected and their claim is filed within the legal time limits.

    Statute of Limitations and Insurance Claims:

    - It’s important to differentiate between filing an insurance claim and a lawsuit. While the statute of limitations applies to filing a lawsuit, insurance companies often have their own deadlines for reporting an injury and filing a claim, which can be much shorter.

    - Therefore, victims should promptly notify the dog owner’s insurance company about the incident, even as they consider legal action.

    The statute of limitations for dog bite lawsuits in Illinois is a critical legal deadline that impacts the ability of victims to seek justice and compensation. Understanding and adhering to this timeframe ensures that the victim's legal rights are preserved. Dog bite victims should seek legal advice immediately after an incident to navigate these time-sensitive aspects effectively. By doing so, they can ensure their case is heard and that they have the best chance of receiving the compensation they deserve for their injuries and suffering.

    The role of homeowner's insurance in dog bite cases is a crucial aspect to consider, particularly in Illinois where dog owners can be held strictly liable for bites and injuries caused by their pets. Homeowner's insurance policies often play a central role in the resolution and compensation of these cases. Let’s explore this in more detail:

    Homeowner's Insurance Coverage for Dog Bites

    1. Liability Coverage: Most homeowner's insurance policies include liability coverage, which typically covers dog bites. This means that if a dog owner's pet bites someone, the insurance may cover the damages, up to the policy's liability limits.

    2. Policy Limits: The amount of compensation available in a dog bite case can be influenced by the limits of the dog owner's homeowner's insurance policy. These limits vary widely depending on the policy.

    3. Exclusions and Breed-Specific Clauses: Some insurance policies may have exclusions for dog bites, particularly for certain breeds that are deemed higher risk. It's important for dog owners to understand their policy details, as these exclusions could affect coverage.

    Role in Settlements:

    - In many dog bite cases, settlements are negotiated with the dog owner's insurance company. These negotiations often revolve around the limits of the insurance policy and the severity of the victim’s injuries.

    - The insurance company will typically investigate the claim, review medical records, and assess the circumstances of the bite to determine liability and the value of the claim.

    Examples Illustrating the Role of Homeowner's Insurance

    1. Standard Claim Scenario: A dog bites a neighbor, causing moderate injuries. The dog owner’s homeowner's insurance policy covers dog bites with a liability limit of $100,000. The victim’s medical expenses and other damages total $30,000. In this case, the insurance would likely cover the full amount of the claim.

    2. Breed-Specific Exclusion Scenario: If the same incident involves a breed that is excluded under the homeowner's policy, the dog owner might be personally responsible for covering the victim's damages, as the insurance would not provide coverage due to the exclusion.

    3. Policy Limit Scenario: In a severe injury case where damages exceed the policy limit, say $200,000 in damages with a policy limit of $100,000, the insurance would cover up to its limit. The victim might seek the remaining damages directly from the dog owner.

    Importance of Legal Representation

    - Victims of dog bites should consider seeking legal representation, especially when dealing with insurance companies. An attorney can help navigate the complexities of insurance claims, ensure that the victim’s rights are protected, and negotiate a fair settlement.

    - Likewise, dog owners should also seek legal advice to understand their rights and responsibilities, especially in situations where their insurance may not fully cover a claim.

    Homeowner's insurance plays a significant role in the financial aspects of dog bite cases in Illinois. Understanding the interplay between homeowner's insurance policies, liability limits, and the specifics of a dog bite incident is essential for both victims and dog owners. Proper legal guidance is crucial in these cases to ensure that all parties involved navigate the claims process effectively and reach an equitable resolution.

    Defenses in Dog Bite Cases:

    While the law favors victims, dog owners can present certain defenses, such as:

    - Proving that the victim provoked the dog.

    - Showing that the victim was trespassing or not lawfully present at the location of the attack.

    Real-Life Example:

    Consider a hypothetical case where a postal worker is bitten by a dog while delivering mail. The worker is legally on the property, and there’s no evidence of provocation. Under Illinois law, the dog owner would likely be held liable for the worker’s injuries and other damages.

    After a dog bite, taking the right steps is crucial not only for health and safety but also for any potential legal action. Here's a detailed guide on what to do immediately following a dog bite incident, especially considering the legal context in Illinois:

    1. Seek Medical Attention:

    - Priority: Your first priority should be to address any injuries. Even if the bite seems minor, it's important to get medical treatment because dog bites can lead to serious infections.

    - Documentation: Ask the medical provider to document your injuries in detail, as this will be important if you decide to pursue legal action.

    2. Report the Incident:

    - Local Authorities: Report the bite to local animal control or the police. This creates an official record of the incident, which can be vital for a legal case.

    - Gather Information: If possible, collect contact information for the dog owner and any witnesses. Note the dog's description and any remarks made by the owner about the dog's vaccination or behavior history.

    3. Document Everything:

    - Photographs: Take photos of your injuries, the location where the bite occurred, and, if possible, the dog.

    - Personal Record: Write down everything you remember about the incident, including the time, location, and circumstances leading up to the bite.

    4. Preserve Evidence:

    - Clothing: Keep the clothes you were wearing at the time of the attack, as they might have evidence like blood stains or tears.

    - Medical Records: Secure copies of all medical records and bills related to your treatment, including emergency room visits, doctor appointments, medications, and any other related expenses.

    5. Contact Animal Control:

    - Follow-Up: Check with animal control to see if they have any prior reports of incidents involving the same dog. This information can be crucial in establishing a pattern of behavior for the dog.

    6. Avoid Direct Negotiations with the Dog Owner:

    - While it might be tempting to handle things directly with the dog owner, it’s advisable not to engage in detailed discussions or negotiations, especially regarding liability or compensation, without legal advice.

    7. Consult with a Personal Injury Attorney:

    - Legal Advice: As soon as possible, consult with an attorney who specializes in personal injury and dog bite cases. A specialized dog bite lawyer can guide you through the legal process and help protect your rights.

    - Contingency Basis: Many personal injury attorneys work on a contingency basis, meaning they only get paid if you receive a settlement or a court award.

    8. Do Not Delay:

    - Statute of Limitations: Remember that in Illinois, there is a two-year statute of limitations for personal injury claims, including dog bites. Delaying action can jeopardize your ability to seek compensation.

    9. Avoid Social Media:

    - Caution: Be cautious about what you post on social media regarding the incident. Statements or photos you share can be used in the legal process.

    10. Insurance Claim:

    - If the dog owner's homeowner's insurance policy covers dog bites, you may need to file a claim. An attorney can assist you with this process to ensure that you provide all necessary information without compromising your legal position.

    The aftermath of a dog bite can be stressful and confusing. Taking these steps can help ensure your health and legal interests are protected. Seeking professional legal advice is key in navigating the complexities of a dog bite case, especially given the nuances of Illinois law. Remember, each dog bite case is unique, and the guidance of an experienced attorney can be invaluable in achieving a fair and just outcome.

    In Illinois, dog bite victims have substantial legal rights. The Animal Control Act provides a framework for seeking justice and compensation. However, navigating the complexities of these cases requires a thorough understanding of the law and skilled legal representation. If you or a loved one has been the victim of a dog attack, it is crucial to consult with an attorney who can guide you through the process and advocate for your rights and entitlements. Remember, each case is unique, and the advice of a knowledgeable attorney is invaluable in pursuing the compensation you deserve.

    Working With Palermo Law Group

    In the unfortunate event of a dog attack, understanding your rights is crucial. Palermo Law Group, a seasoned law firm specializing in personal injury lawsuits, stands ready to support you through this challenging time. We are committed to ensuring your claim is handled with the utmost care and professionalism. Our experienced dog bite attorney offers a free consultation, providing the guidance and representation you need to navigate the complexities of your situation. With Palermo Law Group by your side, you can confidently pursue the justice and compensation you deserve.

    For a free consultation contact our law firm by calling (630)684-2332 or visit our website at


    Mario Palermo is the Founder and Lead Attorney at Palermo Law Group in Oak Brook, Illinois. For the past 26 years, he has worked tirelessly to help injury victims and their families in their times of need. He is a seasoned authority on civil litigation, and also a member of the Million Dollar Advocates Forum, a prestigious group of trial lawyers who have won million and multi-million dollar verdicts and settlements. Mr. Palermo has been named a “Leading Lawyer” by his peers in 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021 and 2022.

    Request a Free Legal Consultation

    Recently Published

    Recent Outcomes

    $1.3 Million

    Mr. Palermo obtained $1.3 million dollars for an airline employee who was injured on the job.


    Palermo obtained $800,000 for the family of 63-year-old woman who died after gallbladder removal surgery.


    Palermo obtained $400,000 for a 28-year-old woman from Aurora that was the victim of a hit-and-run.